Protocols
Estimated DZ coverage by protocol based on validator distribution
Estimated Data
Protocol coverage percentages are estimates based on typical validator distribution patterns. Actual coverage may vary depending on specific transaction routing. For accurate personal coverage, check your wallet on the home page.
Jito
MEV/Staking
MEV infrastructure and liquid staking
Marinade
Liquid Staking
Liquid staking protocol for mSOL
Drift
Perpetuals
Decentralized perpetual futures exchange
Kamino
Lending
DeFi yield optimization and lending
Jupiter
DEX Aggregator
Leading DEX aggregator on Solana
Orca
AMM DEX
User-friendly DEX with Whirlpools
Raydium
AMM DEX
Automated market maker with concentrated liquidity
Tensor
NFT Marketplace
NFT trading and AMM platform
How we estimate protocol coverage:
- 1. We analyze the distribution of validators processing transactions for each protocol
- 2. Coverage is estimated based on the stake-weighted probability of landing on a DZ validator
- 3. Protocols with more MEV-sensitive transactions often have higher DZ coverage due to latency advantages
// Coverage varies by time, network conditions, and transaction type
Why DZ coverage matters for protocols:
Lower latency means better prices and less slippage on DEX trades
Dedicated infrastructure reduces front-running and sandwich attacks
Higher success rates for time-sensitive liquidations and arbitrage